IT is difficult to understand the mindset of CCTV critics. What would the bleeding hearts prefer? Lawbreakers getting away with it? Heinous crimes going undetected and the job of the police made harder?

Those who squeal about mass surveillance need a reality check.

Technology which tracks our movements exists everywhere now and the chances are you’ve got one close to hand.

The majority of people fully recognise the advantages of CCTV and understand that when we don’t have it, it only protects wrongdoers.

CCTV has played a massive role in the apprehension and conviction of thousands of guilty parties, and an alibi for the innocent.

From those who mug old ladies to reckless drivers mowing down pedestrians, or terror suspects planting bombs.

Not to mention providing vital clues in the hunt for missing people.

One of the most chilling examples was when CCTV captured the sick killers of toddler James Bulger; leading him away from a shopping centre and clutching his trusting little hand.

It proved beyond doubt that those in custody were responsible.

So given all the advantages, either accept CCTV as part of 21st century life or take a trip to North Korea before you start breast-beating about an infringement of your human rights.