Monday, 31 August 2015

Resident anger over energy co-op’s Pennington windfarm ‘tactics’

OPPONENTS of five giant wind turbines in Furness say the proposed windfarm would ruin their lives.

OPPOSITION: The existing Harlock Hill windfarm near Pennington. Inset, an extract from the minutes of the latest Baywind AGM, which stressed the need to convince “friends and family” to show their support for the plans

Residents living just a few hundred metres from the site of the planned 99.5m (326ft) structures criticised tactics used by energy companies in a bid to get their planning application approved.

A joint application for the 11.5MW wind farm was submitted to South Lakeland District Council and Barrow Borough Council by Infinergy and Baywind Energy Co-operative.

SLDC planners have acknowledged more than 300 letters of support – but residents near the site in Pennington say the majority have come from outside the South Lakes area.

The Evening Mail has also seen minutes from the latest Baywind AGM, which stressed the need to convince “friends and family” to show their support for the plans.

Residents in the nearest four properties to the site of the proposed windfarm fear their objections could be drowned out by the voices of people who will not be affected by the development.

Stephen Parr, of Ewedale Farm, said: “We are not NIMBYs – we live between two windfarms – but it is causing so much upset it’s unbelievable.”

He said one of his neighbours had been so distressed by the situation it had made her unwell and she had tried to sell her home.

John McMinn, of Standish Cote added: “We are fighting hundreds of people who don’t live anywhere near here.”

Annette Heslop, director of Baywind Energy, said she saw nothing wrong with asking local members to encourage their like-minded friends and family to show their support.

She added: “We only asked people to write who live closest to the wind farm.”

Councillor Ian McPherson, chairman of SLDC’s planning committee, said members could use their discretion in deciding how much weight to give people’s comments and that proximity to the proposed development is a relevant consideration.

SLDC planners acknowledged the benefits of the wind farm, which would provide enough power for 6,000 homes, but had recommended refusal saying this was outweighed by the impact upon neighbours.

The planning report says the “dominating” turbines would “exert a harmful influence on the living conditions currently enjoyed by neighbouring residents”.

The application was deferred at the request of Baywind to allow the applicants more time to consider the planning report.

Mrs Heslop said refusal of the plans could threaten Baywind’s future, placing some of its seven local jobs at risk. She said the company currently has no back-up plan should the application fail.

Have your say

over sized and will dominate the south lakes peninsula. There are plenty wind farms out at sea why do we need more! nothing more than greed and waste of money to tax payers.

Posted by Visitor to the area on 15 November 2012 at 22:49

As regards Mrs R Walkers article posted 9.11.12 at 09.23. We local Nimbys that she refers to are not surprised that she has no objections to the installations of 5 x 99.5m Turbines to be erected on Mean Moor & Harlock Hill. Why would she when she and her family stand to make significant financial gain due to them being the landowners of the land that 3 off the 5 Turbines are proposed to be erected on. Mrs Walkers home is no were near the development she cannot see the Turbines from where she lives.
Mrs Walkers has had the cheek to insult her neighbours & ex freinds Nimbeys!
and short sightedness dose she even know the meaning of the word.
We Nimbys already live and have done for many years, in the middle of Harlock & Askam wind farms already,only a few hundred meters from our properties. How much more of not being a Nimbys can we actually be?

We do not mind or complain about the existing Turbines we live with them every day, we are not Nimbys and fully support green sustainable energy,that dose not dominate and scar the landscape and local amenities.
Thank fully the six local parish councils have all recommended for refusal.
S.L.D.C. own planning officer has recommended for refusal.
Hopefully the planning committee will also realise how much we locals will be affected by this out of scale development and also refuse the application.

Posted by So called Nimby on 12 November 2012 at 18:20

View all 13 comments on this article

Make your comment

Your name

Your Email

Your Town/City

Your comment


Hot jobs

New vacancies


BBC News business headlines